Solved Case Analysis: Acquisition Cost Allocation at Progressive Insurance by Phillip E. Pfeifer, Benjamin Potter

0.00$

Get the Best Analysis to this Case Study written by MBA/CFA writers.

**Solution would be delivered to your registered email address within next 4 days. If you want the solution any earlier drop an email at assignment@writerkingdom.com.  Click Here to see how it works

Compare

Description

Omar Parvaiz, Progressive Insurance field product manager in charge of Tennessee and South Carolina, must analyze the results of a yearlong test of a new pricing algorithm he developed. The new algorithm allocated marketing costs to policies at a variable rate so the allocated marketing costs (and corresponding price in the cost-plus pricing system) increased with the other costs (primarily expected loss costs) associated with providing auto insurance to the policy holder. In contrast to the variable-cost allocation method was the traditional flat method in which each policy was assigned a fixed amount of marketing cost. The change to the variable-allocation scheme would make Progressive’s pricing more competitive for higher-priced policies and less competitive for lower-priced policies. Tennessee was chosen as the experimental group, and other states in the region served as the control. Parvaiz must now figure out if the new pricing algorithm is better than the old one.

Publishing Authority:

Darden Business Publishing – University of Virginia

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Solved Case Analysis: Acquisition Cost Allocation at Progressive Insurance by Phillip E. Pfeifer, Benjamin Potter”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *